Teorije zavjere [Arhiv] - Moj Novac - > Forumi. Forging a “New World Order” Under a One World Government. Global Power and Global Government: Part 4by Andrew Gavin Marshall. Globalization and the New World Order. Hande Yener Serdar Ortaç İki Deli. Model Sarı Kurdeleler. Kaan Tangöze Bekle Dedi Gitti.Usage Statistics for www.globalvp.umn.edu Summary Period: April 2015 - Referrer Generated 01-May-2015 09:04 CDT. Report Statistico per il dominio www.ercolinamilanesi.com Riepilogo per il periodo: Aprile 2015 - Referrer Generato 01-mag-2015 06:26 CEST. Previše je stanovnika na zemlji, posebice u meksiku pa eto nek se malo to sreže.a uz to i nova zarada za farmaceutske kompanije. Kak uderzhatjsya na plavu 1996 HDRip. Zhit kak koroli 1997 DivX DVDRip BestVideo. Kak vyjti zamuzh za milliardera 2011 DUB DVDRip XviD Vaippp. Usage Statistics for www.livingstonco.ky.gov Summary Period: April 2015 - Referrer Generated 01-May-2015 01:20 EDT. Usage statistics for www.coexplastics.com Summary Period: April 2015 - Referrer Generated 01-May-2015 01:16 HKT. The 1. 99. 0s saw the emergence of what was called the New World Order. This was a term that emerged in the early 1. Soviet Union and the newfound role of the United States as the sole and unchallenged global power. The New World Order was meant to represent a new phase in the global political economy in which world authority rested in one place, and for the time, that place was to be the United States. This era saw the continual expansion and formation of regional blocs, with the formation of the European Union, the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the creation of the WTO. The World Trade Organization was officially formed in 1. General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was formed in 1. Bretton- Woods Conference. The WTO manages the international liberal trading order. The first Director- General of the WTO was Peter D. Sutherland, who was previously the director general of GATT, former Attorney General of Ireland, and currently is Chairman of British Petroleum and Goldman Sachs International, as well as being special representative of the United Nations secretary- general for migrations. He is also a member of the board of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum, goodwill ambassador to the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation, is a member of the Bilderberg Group, and is European Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, and he was presented with the Robert Schuman Medal for his work on European Integration and the David Rockefeller Award of the Trilateral Commission.[1] Clearly, the WTO was an organ of the western banking elite to be used as a tool in expanding and institutionalizing their control over world trade. The European Superstate. In 1. 99. 2, the Maastricht Treaty was signed, which officially formed the European Union in 1. In 1. 99. 4, the European Monetary Institute (EMI) was formed, with the European Central Bank (ECB) being formed in 1. European currency, the Euro, debuting in 1. In 2. 00. 4, the European Constitution was to be signed by all 2. EU, which was a treaty to establish a constitution for the entire European Union. The Constitution was a move towards creating a European superstate, creating an EU foreign minister, and with it, coordinated foreign policy, with the EU taking over the seat of Britain on the UN Security Council, representing all EU member states, forcing the nations to “actively and unreservedly” follow an EU foreign policy; set out the framework to create an EU defence policy, as an appendage to or separate from NATO; the creation of a European Justice system, with the EU defining “minimum standards in defining offences and setting sentences,” and creates common asylum and immigration policy; and it would also hand over to the EU the power to “ensure co- ordination of economic and employment policies”; and EU law would supercede all law of the member states, thus making the member nations relative to mere provinces within a centralized federal government system.[2]Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, had stated that he feared that the concept of a stronger and more centralized European Union, as “the developments in the E. U. are really dangerous with regard to moving out of a free society and moving more and more toward masterminding control and regulation,” and that, “We [the Czech Republic] spent a half- century under communist eyes. We are more sensitive than some other West Europeans. We feel things, we see things, we touch things that we don't like. For us, the European Union reminds us of COMECON [Moscow's organization for economic control of the Soviet bloc].” He elaborated saying that the similarity with COMECON is not ideologically based, but in its structure, “The decisions are made not in your own country. For us who lived through the communist era, this is an issue.”[3]The Constitution was largely written up by Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, former President of the French Republic from 1. Giscard d’Estaing also happens to be a member of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and is also a close friend of Henry Kissinger, having co- authored papers with him. In 2. 00. 5, French and Dutch voters answered the referendums in their countries, in which they rejected the EU Constitution, which required total unanimity in order to pass. In 2. 00. 7, a move was undertaken to introduce what was called the Lisbon Treaty, to be approved by all member- states. Giscard d’Estaing wrote an article for the Independent in which he stated that, “The difference between the original Constitution and the present Lisbon Treaty is one of approach, rather than content.” He described the process of creating the Lisbon Treaty: “It was the legal experts for the European Council who were charged with drafting the new text. They have not made any new suggestions. They have taken the original draft constitution, blown it apart into separate elements, and have then attached them, one by one, to existing treaties. The Treaty of Lisbon is thus a catalogue of amendments. It is unpenetrable for the public.” The main difference was that the word “constitution” was removed and banished from the text.[4]The Telegraph reported that though the Treaty dropped the word “constitution,” it remained the same in “giving the EU the trappings of a global power and cutting national sovereignty.” It contained plans to create an EU President, who “will serve a two and half year term but unlike democratic heads of state he or she will be chosen by Europe's leaders not by voters” and “will take over key international negotiations from national heads of government.” The Constitution’s “Foreign Minister” becomes the “High Representative,” who “will run a powerful EU diplomatic service and will be more important on the global and European stage than national foreign ministers.” It sets out to create an “Interior Ministry” which will “centralise databases holding fingerprints and DNA,” and “make EU legislation on new police and surveillance powers.” The ability for EU nations to use vetoes will end, and the Treaty “includes a clause hardwiring an EU "legal personality" and ascendancy over national courts.”[5]One country in Europe has it written into its constitution that it requires a referendum on treaties, and that country is Ireland. In June of 2. 00. Irish went to vote on the Treaty of Lisbon, after weeks and months of being badgered by EU politicians and Eurocrats explaining that the Irish “owe” Europe a “Yes” vote because of the benefits the EU had bestowed upon Ireland. History will show, however, that the Irish don’t take kindly to being bossed around and patronized, so when they went to the polls, “No” was on their lips and on their ballots. The Irish thus rejected the Lisbon Treaty. North American Integration. The Canada- US Free Trade Agreement of 1. President George HW Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. The FTA had devastating consequences for the people of Canada and the United States, while enriching the corporate and political elite. For example, GDP growth decreased, unemployment increased the most since the Great Depression,[6] and meanwhile, Brian Mulroney entered the corporate world, of which he now sits as a board member of Barrick Gold Corporation, as well as sitting on the International Advisory Board of the Council on Foreign Relations,[7] of which David Rockefeller remains on as Honorary Chairman. In 1. 99. 0, the private sector lobbying groups and think tanks began the promotion of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to expand the Canada- US Free Trade Agreement to include Mexico. NAFTA was signed by then Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, US President George H. W. Bush and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, in 1. It was negotiated during a time in which Mexico was undergoing liberal economic reforms, so NAFTA had the effect of cementing those reforms in an “economic constitution for North America.”[8]David Rockefeller played a role in the push for NAFTA. In 1. 96. 5, he had founded the Council for Latin America (CLA), which, as he wrote in a 1. Foreign Affairs, was to mobilize private enterprise throughout the hemisphere “to stimulate and support economic integration.” The CLA, David wrote, “provides an effective channel of cooperation between businessmen in the United States and their counterparts in the countries to the south. It also offers a means of continuing communication and consultation with the White House, the State Department and other agencies of our government.”[9]The CLA later changed its name to the Council of the Americas (Co. A) and maintains a very close relationship with the Americas Society, founded at the same time as the CLA, of which David Rockefeller remains to this day as Chairman of both organizations. As David wrote in his autobiography, Memoirs, in the lead up to NAFTA, the Council of the Americas sponsored a Forum of the Americas, which was attended by President George H. W. Bush, which resulted in the call for a “Western Hemisphere free trade area.”[1. In 1. 99. 3, David Rockefeller wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal, in the run up to NAFTA, in which he advocated for the signing of NAFTA as essential, describing it as a vital step on the road to fulfilling his life long work, and that, “Everything is in place - - after 5. Western Hemisphere,” and further, that “I truly don't think that "criminal" would be too strong a word to describe an action on our part, such as rejecting Nafta, that would so seriously jeopardize all the good that has been done - - and remains to be done.”[1. In 1. 99. 4, Mexico entered into a financial crisis, often referred to as the Mexican peso crisis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |